Emergencies and Disasters Working Group

Emergencies and Disasters Working Group

Dr. Duha Shellah

Public Health in Emergencies and Disasters Working Group Chair Interview: Dr. Duha Shellah

News

Apr 15, 2025

From conflicts to climate change, the need for resilient health systems and equitable access to care has never been more urgent. Dr. Duha Shellah, the newly appointed Chair of the World Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA) Public Health in Emergencies and Disasters Working Group, is at the forefront of this global challenge. A Palestinian physician, scientist, and youth activist, Dr. Shellah brings a wealth of experience, passion, and vision to her role. 

In a recent interview with WFPHA, she shared her journey, motivations, and plans for the working group’s future. Here’s a glimpse into her inspiring story and the impactful work she aims to lead.  

Introduce yourself. 

Duha Shellah: I’m Dr. Duha Shellah, a Palestinian physician, scientist, medical journalist, and youth activist. I’m deeply committed to advancing research, global health, and youth leadership. I’m the founder and chairwoman of The Researchist Organization, which promotes a research culture and supports early-career researchers and scientists in Palestine and the region. I also serve as the Vice Chair of the WHO Youth Council in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, leading the Youth in Emergencies Working Group. Additionally, I’m the Research Lead and EMR Delegate at the Young Council of the World Federation of Public Health Associations and chair of Women in Global Health’s Palestine chapter.  

I also coordinate the Medical and Health Sciences Division at the Palestine Academy for Science and Technology. I currently work at Juzoor for Health and Social Development, a prominent public health institution in Palestine focusing on social determinants of health. Internationally, I was recognized as one of the 41 Emerging Voices for Global Health in 2024 and was honored to be named among the 21 Outstanding Young Physicians Under 40 at the Inter Academy Partnership Young Physician Leaders Program in 2022.  

As the Chair of the Public Health in Emergencies and Disasters Working Group under WFPHA, I aim to build on the significant contributions of my predecessors, Dr. Chadia Wannous and Prof. Colette Cunningham. I focus on enhancing emergency preparedness, promoting health equity, and strengthening responses to crises, particularly in conflict-affected regions. This vision aligns with WFPHA’s mission to protect people and the planet, prevent diseases, and promote health, peace, and well-being.  

What motivated you to pursue a career in the public health sector?  

Duha Shellah: My motivation to pursue a career in public health arose from witnessing the devastating impact of occupation and conflict on public health. In Palestine, my home country, severe health disparities—compounded by environmental crises and limited access to healthcare—underscore the urgent need for a resilient health system. This experience galvanized my commitment to public health to address these interconnected challenges. I aim to tackle what WFPHA calls a “syndemic” by focusing on emergency preparedness and long-term health equity. I hope to contribute to a future where health systems can withstand crises while ensuring fair access to care for all.  

How long have you been associated with the WFPHA?  

Duha Shellah: I’ve been actively involved with WFPHA since May 2023, initially through the Young WFPHA, where I serve as the EMR Delegate and Research Lead. I also represent Young WFPHA at the 1st Regional Youth Council of WHO as the Vice Chair of the WHO EMRO Youth Council. Being associated with Young WFPHA since 2023 has allowed me to collaborate on research initiatives and advocacy efforts as a young professional. We’ve worked on projects focusing on emergency preparedness, health equity, and conflict-affected regions. This experience provided a solid foundation for my current role as Chair of the Public Health in Emergencies and Disasters Working Group.  

What’s your vision for the working group?  

Duha Shellah: My vision for the working group focuses on developing comprehensive training modules on emergency preparedness and response. We will organize webinars and workshops to disseminate best practices, exchange experiences, and build capacity among public health professionals globally. We also plan to publish policy briefs and research to support evidence-based decision-making.  

I aim to expand these efforts by fostering stronger partnerships with key stakeholders such as WHO, IFRC, and UNICEF. We will prioritize integrating public health into national, regional, and international disaster management plans, mainly focusing on conflict zones. The vision is to enhance the resilience of health systems globally, aligning with WFPHA’s mission to protect people and the planet while promoting peace and well-being.  

How do the working group’s activities align with the support and implementation of the WFPHA strategic plan? 

Duha Shellah: The planned activities for the working group directly support WFPHA’s strategic goals. For Goal 1, advocating for peace and sustainable health equity, the working group will advocate for policies that ensure equitable healthcare access during emergencies. For Goal 2, promoting system change and decolonizing public health, we’ll emphasize locally driven solutions and inclusive policies to address structural inequalities. For Goal 3, strengthening global health governance, collaborations with international organizations will promote a more democratic and resilient global health governance system. For Goal 4, advancing public health knowledge and practice, the working group will contribute to advancing public health practice and education globally through research and capacity building.  

In what ways is being part of the WFPHA going to help advance the activities of the Working Group?

Duha Shellah: WFPHA’s extensive network has been invaluable in amplifying our advocacy efforts and expanding our reach. By collaborating with organizations like WFPHA, other UN agencies, and regional public health associations, we will disseminate best practices, exchange experiences more broadly, and influence policy at national and international levels. This network will also facilitate access to resources and expertise, significantly enhancing our training, research initiatives, and peace collaborations. These efforts align with the WFPHA’s mission to promote peace, health, and well-being.  

How will the Working Group contribute to the development of emergency preparedness plans at an international level?  

Duha Shellah: We’re committed to developing and disseminating policy briefs that advocate integrating public health into national and international disaster management frameworks. We will research the impact of conflicts and climate crises on public health to inform evidence-based emergency preparedness strategies. Additionally, we will engage with key international stakeholders to standardize emergency response protocols. Our approach emphasizes addressing the root causes of health disparities, including conflict and environmental degradation, in line with the WFPHA’s mission.  

Any last comments?  

Duha Shellah: Emergencies and disasters magnify inequities, leaving the most vulnerable to bear the heaviest burdens. True resilience is not just about response—it’s about justice, dignity, and ensuring that every community has equitable access to health and protection regardless of their circumstances. As a Palestinian physician and activist in this role as Chair of the Public Health in Emergencies and Disasters Working Group, I am committed to championing a people-centered approach that prioritizes the unheard, safeguards frontline workers, and builds sustainable health systems rooted in equity. Thank you.  

Conclusion: A Leader for a Healthier, More Equitable Future  

Dr. Duha Shellah’s journey and vision are a testament to the power of resilience, leadership, and unwavering commitment to equity. Her work with the WFPHA Public Health in Emergencies and Disasters Working Group promises to bring transformative change, particularly for communities in conflict zones and those most vulnerable to crises. By prioritizing preparedness, equity, and collaboration, Dr. Shellah is paving the way for a future where health systems are resilient but also just and inclusive. Her leadership reminds us that hope and action can create a healthier, more equitable world for all in the face of adversity.

 

Nicotine Poses a Particularly Serious Threat to Public Health

Nicotine Poses a Particularly Serious Threat to Public Health

a person holding a ball

Nicotine Poses a Serious Threat to Public Health: Why it Needs Strict UN Control

News

Apr 11, 2025

Nicotine, the addictive substance in tobacco, is a growing public health crisis. With the rise of e-cigarettes, nicotine pouches, and flavored products targeting children, urgent action is needed. Dr. David Chalom, a senior consultant in orthopedic surgery, argues that nicotine must be reviewed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and placed under strict international control by the UN to protect future generations.  

The Dangers of Tobacco and Nicotine

1. Tobacco: A leading cause of preventable death  

Tobacco is the leading cause of non-communicable diseases worldwide. Two-thirds of long-term smokers die from smoking-related illnesses. Unfortunately, tobacco use persists because of nicotine addiction.

2. Nicotine: A potent neurotoxin and highly addictive drug

Originally used as an insecticide, nicotine is toxic to humans. It’s also more addictive than cocaine and amphetamines, leading to lifelong dependency. Other issues with nicotine include:

– Impairing brain development in youth (up to age 25), increasing risks of: 

       – Mental health disorders  

       – Addiction to other drugs (alcohol, narcotics)  

       – Poor cognitive function 

– Damaging blood vessels, reducing oxygen supply to organs, leading to

        – Increased risk of stroke and heart disease  

        – Poor healing and tissue degeneration

– Harming fertility, pregnancy, and infants, increasing risks of:

          – Miscarriage  

          – Low birth weight  

          – Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)  

The Rise of New Nicotine Products Targeting Youth

The tobacco industry exploits regulatory loopholes by introducing flavored nicotine products designed to attract children:  

– E-cigarettes (vapes)  

– Nicotine pouches (“white snus”)  

– Nicotine candies (jelly beans, gummies, lollipops)  

– Lip balms, mints, and Tic-Tacs laced with nicotine  

Alarming Trends in Sweden (2012-2024 Data)

The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs (C.A.N.) did a nationwide school investigation between 2012 and 2024 on 9th graders and 2nd-year high schoolers. It found that 9th graders and high school students are increasingly using:

  – E-cigarettes  

  – Nicotine pouches  

  – Snus

All of this is problematic. While these youths are considered “non-smoking,” they become addicted to nicotine, later transitioning to cigarettes.  

What Experts and International Conventions Say

 

  1. European Respiratory Society (ERS)

No evidence supports claims that nicotine products help smokers quit. Most e-cigarette users continue smoking traditional cigarettes. Thus, nicotine remains harmful and addictive.  

  1. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC)  

Governments must work to:  

– Eliminate tobacco and nicotine use  

– Protect children from addiction  

– Reduce secondhand smoke exposure  

  1. UN Conventions

Consider two UN Conventions: the UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs (1961/1972) and the UN Convention on Psychotropic Substances (1971). These treaties allow scheduling substances that pose serious public health risks.  

Why Nicotine Must Be Reviewed by the WHO and Controlled by the UN

Nicotine meets all criteria for strict international control: 

– Highly addictive  

– Widely abused, especially by youth  

– Minimal therapeutic value

– Serious public health threat  

Call to Action: Steps Toward a Nicotine-Free Generation by 2030

Nicotine isn’t just an addiction; it’s a public health emergency. With flavored products targeting children and the rising outh addiction rates, immediate action is needed. The WHO must review nicotine, and the UN must impose strict controls to protect future generations.

Yet, from the individual to the state level, everyone has a role to play:

– Governments: Notify the UN Secretary-General to review nicotine.  

– NGOs & Health Organizations: Petition the WHO to assess nicotine’s risks.  

– Public Awareness: Get educated on nicotine’s dangers, especially for youth.  

Together, we can all work towards a nicotine-free generation by 2023.

Do you have questions for David? Then don’t hesitate to write him at david.chalom.a@gmail.com

 

Gender Equity in Dentistry

Gender Equity in Dentistry

man in white scrub suit holding green hose

Reimagining Global Health Strategies: Reinforcing Gender Equity in Dentistry for a Healthier Future

News

Apr 5, 2025

Reimagining global health strategies requires confronting persistent inequities that shape health outcomes, particularly in dentistry and gender equity. Gender equity is not only a fundamental human right but also a strategic imperative for improving population health, strengthening health systems, and achieving sustainable development. Yet, in fields such as dentistry, gender equity remains overshadowed by longstanding structural and cultural norms.

According to the Canadian Encyclopedia, gender equity in healthcare refers to treating individuals according to their unique needs and contexts, considering how power and privilege affect opportunity. This principle is tied to the core value of fairness and is critical to building inclusive, ethical, and sustainable systems that reflect the diversity of health providers and their communities. Harmful gender stereotypes, alongside racism, ageism, and socioeconomic inequities, compound existing barriers to oral healthcare access and professional advancement for women and gender-diverse individuals. 

Why Gender Equity Matters in Dentistry

Neglecting gender equity in dentistry perpetuates significant inequities across research, clinical practice, and leadership. Despite progress in gender diversity in dental schools, systemic transformation remains elusive. Structural barriers and cultural norms continue to shape career trajectories, specialization choices, and professional development. 

  • Access to equitable oral health care: Women and gender-diverse individuals face unique challenges in accessing oral healthcare, shaped by systemic, social, economic, and personal barriers. Poor maternal oral health extends beyond mothers, significantly affecting children’s well-being. Additionally, gender-diverse individuals remain underrepresented in digital innovations like virtual oral healthcare, which exacerbates existing disparities in quality healthcare access.

  • Education and gender myths in dentistry: Though more women enter dental programs, a persistent gender equity myth falsely assumes that inclusivity has already been achieved. Invisible gender-based discrimination often goes unaddressed, leaving affected individuals isolated without institutional support.
  • Clinical practice and workplace culture: Masculinist work cultures, sexism, harassment, and gender stereotypes remain a reality in dentistry, impacting job satisfaction and career advancement for women and gender-diverse individuals. These barriers contribute to vertical and horizontal segregation in dentistry.
  • Research disparities: Women face significant gaps in authorship, funding access, and scientific recognition. Men dominate highly cited publications and editorial boards, perpetuating systemic barriers in dental research equity.

  • Glass ceiling in dental leadership: Outdated gender norms and patriarchal structures limit leadership opportunities. Men disproportionately hold high-ranking academic roles (e.g., deans, department heads). At the same time, women remain often overrepresented in lower-ranking faculty positions, which are exacerbated by unequal pay and exclusion from decision-making.

Global challenges such as population aging, COVID-19, and climate change demand that dental health strategies be reimaged through a gender-equity lens, promoting sustainable and inclusive oral healthcare systems.

Pathways to Achieve Gender Equity in Dentistry

Addressing gender equity challenges in dentistry requires coordinated systemic efforts to restructure the profession. A gender-equitable future fosters better care, innovation, and responsive systems.

1. Structural Change & Policy Reform

  • Collect and publish gender-disaggregated data to inform policy and clinical decision-making.
  • Evaluate DEIAB (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Accessibility and Belonging) initiatives regularly.
  • Diversify career advancement and promotion criteria.

2. Mentorship & Leadership Development

  • Establish mentorship programs for women and gender-diverse professionals.
  • Create leadership training for underrepresented groups.
  • Showcase diverse role models to inspire the next generation.

3. Inclusive Education & Clinical Training

  • Integrate gender equity and intersectionality into dental curricula.
  • Train faculty and students to address gender-specific oral health needs.
  • Promote inclusive, patient-centered clinical practices.

4. Gender-Inclusive Innovation & Sustainability

  • Ensure equitable access to digital dentistry tools.
  • Include gender-diverse perspectives in healthcare innovation.
  • Embed gender equity in sustainable dentistry, acknowledging climate change’s disproportionate impact on women in low-resource settings.

A Call to Action: Building an Equitable Future in Dentistry

Gender equity in dentistry is more than a matter of fairness. It is necessary for building a healthier, more inclusive, and resilient profession. Aligning efforts with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development can advance social justice. Achieving equity requires collective action from institutions, policymakers, educators, and providers. By dismantling structural discrimination and fostering inclusivity, we can close the gender gap and ensure that all individuals, regardless of gender or background, thrive in dental education, practice, and leadership.

Dr. Pascaline Kengne Talla wrote this article on behalf of the WFPHA’s Oral Health Working Group 

Public Mental Health Working Group

Public Mental Health Working Group

Headshots of two people

Public Mental Health Working Group Co-Chairs Interview: Professor Jutta Lindert and Dr. Jonathan Campion

News

Apr 2, 2025

Public mental health is an increasingly recognized component of public health, vital for improving population well-being and addressing inequalities worldwide. In this interview, we speak with Professor Jutta Lindert and Dr. Jonathan Campion, co-chairs of the World Federation of Public Health Associations’ (WFPHA) Public Mental Health Working Group. 

Jutta and Jonathan share their insights, experiences, and visions for advancing public mental health.

Jonathan and Jutta – please introduce yourselves.

Jonathan Campion: I’m Director of Public Mental Health and Consultant Psychiatrist at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust in the UK. I am also co-chair of the Public Mental Health Section at the European Psychiatric Association and chair of the Public Mental Health Special Interest Group at the World Psychiatric Association. At the WFPHA, I co-chair the Public Mental Health Working Group with Professor Jutta Lindert. Additionally, I’m an Honorary Professor of Public Mental Health at the University of Cape Town, South Africa.

Jutta Lindert: I am a Professor of Public Health from Germany, specializing in public mental health. I co-chair the Public Mental Health section of the European Public Health Association (EUPHA), which I founded 20 years ago. Back then, public mental health was rarely discussed, but it is now gaining prominence, not just in Europe but globally. I’m thrilled to see the WFPHA embracing this focus because mental health has historically been on the margins of public health. Today, it’s becoming a central concern.

At the WFPHA, I co-chair the Public Mental Health Working Group with Dr. Jonathan Campion. Additionally, I lead a huge European consortium on Youth Mental Health.

How long have you been part of the World Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA)?

Jonathan Campion: The WFPHA Public Mental Health Working Group was launched on  2/5/23 during the 17th World Congress on Public Health in Rome. I co-chair this group with Professor Lindert, and other members include Professor Bettina Borisch, Dr. Marta Caminiti, and Professor Paul Unschuld.

Jutta Lindert:  I first observed the WFPHA’s work around 2002 or 2003 but couldn’t actively participate due to other commitments. Over the years, I have appreciated the Federation’s global perspective, essential for understanding and addressing mental health issues in diverse contexts. Now, I am honored to serve as co-chair for the newly founded Public Mental Health Working Group.

What interested you in entering the public health sector?

Jutta Lindert: My primary motivation has always been to improve the health of populations, particularly those living in vulnerable situations. As a researcher, I focus on identifying and mitigating health risks for these groups. It is very important for me to provide reliable data that can inform policies and actions. We need good science to respond to public health needs. Public health combines research and action—using evidence to reduce risks and improve outcomes for those most in need.

Jonathan Campion: I initially trained as a general practitioner and saw firsthand how pervasive mental health issues were, particularly in underserved settings. I also realized how neglected mental health was and how it both drives and is driven by social determinants. This inspired me to train in psychiatry and then focus on broader public mental health policy and practice. The massive implementation gap struck me for the treatment and prevention of mental health conditions and the promotion of mental well-being and resilience. I’m passionate about supporting the scale implementation of evidence-based public mental health interventions to sustainably reduce the burden of mental health conditions and promote well-being, particularly in marginalized communities.

What does public mental health mean to you?

Jonathan Campion: Public mental health involves a population approach to sustainably reduce the burden of mental health conditions and promote population mental wellbeing and resilience through scale implementation of evidence-based public mental health interventions to prevent associated impacts, treat mental health conditions, prevent mental health conditions, and promote mental well-being and resilience.

Despite the availability of such interventions provided by different sectors, there is a massive implementation gap, particularly in low- and middle-income countries —only a minority of those with mental health conditions receive treatment with negligible coverage of interventions to prevent mental health conditions or promote mental well-being and resilience. Addressing this gap prevents population-scale suffering, improves a range of public health relevant outcomes, and reduces associated economic costs. Public mental health approaches represent a key opportunity for public health. 

Jutta Lindert: As WHO rightly emphasizes, there is no health without mental health. Public mental health is about more than just addressing mental disorders, which affect one-third of the global population during their lifetime. Mental health and mental health conditions need to be understood as a continuum. As symptoms can be identified at an early level, it is crucial to better understand the onset and trajectories of mental health conditions. It also involves fostering resilience and reducing environmental and social risks. Strengthening mental health prepares populations for change and transformation, reducing stigma and promoting openness.

What are your goals and visions for the WFPHA Public Mental Health Working Group?

Jutta Lindert: Our primary goal is to disseminate knowledge and foster collaboration across sectors, disciplines, and countries. We aim to deepen understanding through research and share findings via webinars, summer schools, and other platforms. Ultimately, we want to improve mental health literacy and public mental health outcomes worldwide.

My vision is to work on a global model of mental health and leave more Euro or North American models behind to serve the world’s populations better.

Jonathan Campion: Our Working Group identified the following five key areas:

  1. Support public mental health knowledge, training, and practice.
  2. Integrate public mental health into public health work.
  3. Raise population awareness about mental health and resilience.
  4. Promote collaboration across systems and disciplines.
  5. Support the implementation and research of evidence-based public mental health interventions.

Our actions include fostering cross-sector collaboration, disseminating resources, organizing workshops, and publishing relevant research. For example, on World Mental Health Day 2023, the WFPHA partnered with the World Psychiatric Association and the World Organization of Family Doctors and signed a public mental health statement to advocate for a whole-system approach to address the global public mental health implementation gap. See more here.

Where do you see public mental health in the next five years?

Jutta Lindert: I hope that public health professionals will universally recognize the importance of public mental health in five years. I envision a world where mental health discussions are as normalized as those about physical health, helping to reduce stigma and foster inclusive conversations. Additionally, research on factors contributing to mental health is essential to Public Mental Health. By reducing risk factors, it might be possible to improve mental health.

Jonathan Campion: The next five years present a significant opportunity to address public mental health implementation failure, especially in low- and middle-income countries. We aim to support greater coordination between sectors and evidence-based action to address the public mental health implementation gap across different sectors. By 2030, we hope to have supported measurable progress in closing the public mental health implementation gap and advancing universal health coverage, including for mental health.

What can individuals do to support mental health—for themselves and others?

Jutta Lindert: Supporting others often enhances one’s mental health. Building caring societies and caring relationships is fundamental. We need to be the change we want to see; ethics is crucial to mental health. Alongside well-known strategies like physical activity and sufficient sleep, we need innovative approaches to bridge the gap between mental health needs and available care.

Last comments

Jutta Lindert: It’s crucial to spread mental health awareness across sectors and develop targeted strategies for different age groups. Building resilience and reducing risks can profoundly impact population health. Future research on public mental health should be supported to allow for more evidence-based actions.

How to support others and their own mental health

Jonathan Campion: Mental health affects every family. Promoting literacy about mental health, recognizing early signs of mental health conditions, and understanding preventive strategies are vital. For example, physical activity can effectively address early depression, while smoking cessation has a similar effect on depression as antidepressants. There are also things we can all do to promote our mental well-being. 

Last comments

Jonathan Campion: Mental health intersects with other public health issues, like tobacco use, which disproportionately affects individuals with mental health conditions. Addressing these overlaps can significantly improve population health. Public health practitioners have a particularly important role in understanding what actions are required at different levels to address the implementation failure. This includes informing policymakers about the size of unmet needs and what the most implementable opportunities are to scale up particular interventions that would have maximum population mental health impact as well as a broad range of impacts across other sectors. The WFPHA’s leadership in public mental health is inspiring, and I look forward to working with the WFPHA on this important agenda.

Conclusion

Public mental health is integral to overall health and well-being. As Professors Lindert and Campion highlight, addressing the public mental health implementation gap and fostering collaboration across sectors can sustainably reduce the impact of mental health conditions and promote the population’s mental well-being and resilience. This results in a broad range of relevant public health impacts. The WFPHA Public Mental Health Working Group is poised to play a pivotal role in this global effort.

Working Group Members:

Professor Bettina Borisch: Professor of Public Health at the University of Geneva; CEO of World Federation of Public Health Associations.

Dr Marta Caminiti: Medical Resident in Public Health at University of Perugia, Italy; Co-chair the Public Mental Health Working Group at the World Federation of Public Health Associations.

Dr Jonathan Campion: Director for Public Mental Health and Consultant Psychiatrist at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust; Co-chair of the Public Mental Health Section at the European Psychiatric Association; Chair of the Public Mental Health Special Interest Group at the World Psychiatric Association; Co-chair the Public Mental Health Working Group at the World Federation of Public Health Associations: Honorary Professor of Public Mental Health at the University of Cape Town, South Africa.

Professor Jutta Lindert: Professor of Public Health at University of Emden (Germany); Co-chair of Public Mental Health Section at the European Public Health Association (EUPHA); Co-chair the Public Mental Health Working Group at the World Federation of Public Health Associations.

Global Public Health Policies for Women, Children, and Youth:

Global Public Health Policies for Women, Children, and Youth:

two babies and woman sitting on sofa while holding baby and watching on tablet

Global Public Health Policies for Women, Children, and Youth: Bridging the Gap

News

Mar 27, 2025

Women, children, and youth face significant health challenges worldwide due to conflict, climate change, and the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite their heightened needs as a vulnerable population, our research reveals a staggering lack of targeted public health policies to protect them. 

This article synthesizes key findings from a global study of 130 Public Health Associations (PHAs) and outlines actionable steps to drive meaningful change.

Why women, children, and youth health matters in public policy

According to a 2022 United Nations report, disparities persist between low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries, affecting these groups’ access to education, healthcare, and economic stability. Marginalized populations, which include ethnic minorities and those in rural or impoverished urban areas, often experience the most significant barriers to maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health services.

That’s where public health policies addressing these inequities come in. Public Health Associations (PHAs) advocate for systemic change, working to reduce health disparities and improve community well-being. 

Yet, a significant gap exists. Few PHAs have dedicated policies or workgroups focused on the health of women, children, and youth.

Key findings: a global policy gap

Our study analyzed 130 Public Health Associations (PHAs) across 203 countries, assessing their policies on women, children, and youth. Here’s what we found:

1. Limited policy development

  • Only eight countries (6.2%) and one regional PHA had published policies on women, children, and youth health.
  • Sixty policies were identified globally, with the U.S. (n=20) and Australia (n=18) accounting for 63%.
  • Other countries with policies included Israel (n=8), Spain (n=3), Malaysia (n=4), Canada (n=3), the U.K. (n=1), and Switzerland (n=1).

2. Few dedicated workgroups

  • Just ten PHAs (7.7%) had a women, children, and youth workgroup.
  • Only half had an established policy mechanism (Switzerland, Australia, Malaysia, U.S., and Georgia). 

3. Regional disparities

  • Despite significant health challenges in these regions, no policies were found from South America or Africa.
  • The European Public Health Association (EUPHA) was the only regional body with dedicated policies.

4. Indigenous, rural, and marginalized young people face the greatest risks

  • Indigenous children experience higher infant mortality, malnutrition, and overrepresentation in justice systems.
  • Climate change, vaccine inequity, and mental health crises disproportionately affect young people in low-resource settings. 

The role of the World Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA)

The World Federation of Public Health Associations (WFPHA), representing over 5 million public health professionals, has been a leader in advocating for women, children, and youth through its dedicated working group. 

Key policies include:

  • Children and Young People’s Health and Rights
  • Oral Health is an Integral Part of Maternal and Child Health
  • Reducing Maternal Mortality as a Human Right
  • Reducing Maternal Mortality Ration (MMR) in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC) through Increasing Skilled Birth Attendants
  • A Human Rights Approach to Preventing and Responding to Violence Against Women and Girls

However, most national PHAs lack comparable frameworks. The WFPHA can bridge this gap by:

  • Supporting PHAs in policy adoption
  • Providing training on policy development
  • Supporting regional collaborations
  • Amplifying marginalized voices in decision-making

A Roadmap for Change: 5 Critical Steps

  1. Create Women, Children, and Youth Workgroups – Every PHA should have a dedicated team for women, children, and youth health.
  2. Adopt & adapt WFPHA policies – Global frameworks must be localized to address regional needs.
  3. Center marginalized communities – Prioritize Indigenous, refugee, and rural communities in policy design.
  4. Strengthen healthcare access – Ensure vaccinations, mental health services, sexual health, and maternal care reach those most at risk.
  5. Engage young people in policy-making – Children and young people must co-design programs that affect their lives.

The time to act is now

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) obligates nations to uphold children’s health and wellbeing. Yet, without stronger policies and investment, millions will continue to fall through the cracks.

Public health leaders, policymakers, and advocates must unite to:

  • Hold governments accountable to international commitments
  • Demand equitable funding for maternal, child, and youth health programs
  • Elevate grassroots solutions from affected communities.

We can build a healthier, more just future for the next generations by addressing these gaps today.

 

Reference

Robards F, Myers H, Klein Walker D. (2024). Global Public Health Association Policies Related to Women, Children and Youth. Journal of Public Health Policy, 45, 807–813.